Full-Time Employment Rose During Biden’s Administration, Contrary to Rick Scott’s Assertion

The Economic Narrative: Debunking Claims About Trump’s Inheritance

In the ever-evolving landscape of American politics, economic narratives often take center stage, especially during election cycles. Recently, Republican Senator Rick Scott made headlines by characterizing the economy that President Donald Trump inherited as “crappy.” This assertion, made during a March 9 interview on CNN’s “State of the Union,” stands in stark contrast to previous analyses that depict a resilient economy under Trump’s predecessor, Joe Biden. This article aims to dissect these claims, providing clarity on the state of the economy during the transition between administrations.

The Context of Economic Growth

When President Trump assumed office in January 2021, the U.S. economy was in a recovery phase following the COVID-19 pandemic. Reports indicated a steady increase in jobs, particularly full-time positions. According to data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), the number of full-time workers rose from approximately 125.2 million at the start of Biden’s presidency to nearly 135.9 million by January 2025. This represents an 8.5% increase, suggesting a robust job market during Biden’s tenure.

Misleading Claims About Full-Time Employment

Senator Scott’s assertion that full-time employment was “dropping almost the entire Biden administration” is misleading. While it is true that there were fluctuations in monthly job figures—17 months of declines in full-time employment—overall, the trend during Biden’s presidency has been one of growth. The net increase in full-time jobs over the 31 months of Biden’s term contradicts Scott’s narrative.

In fact, the number of full-time workers in January 2025 exceeded pre-pandemic levels, indicating a recovery that many economists would consider a success. The BLS reported that the share of workers usually working full-time was 80.7% in 2023, a figure that aligns closely with pre-pandemic statistics.

The GOP Narrative: A “Crappy Economy”

Scott’s characterization of the economy as “crappy” aligns with a broader GOP narrative that seeks to frame Trump as a savior of a failing economic landscape. This narrative has been echoed by other Republican leaders, including House Speaker Mike Johnson, who claimed that Trump must “reshape” the economy after “four years” of disastrous policies.

However, this perspective overlooks the positive economic indicators that emerged during the latter part of Biden’s administration. For instance, inflation rates, which peaked at 9.1% in June 2022, have since decreased significantly, reaching 2.8% by February 2025. Such improvements suggest that the economy was not in a state of catastrophe as claimed by some GOP figures.

Expert Opinions on Economic Conditions

Economists have weighed in on the state of the economy that Trump inherited. Peter Morici, a professor at the University of Maryland, emphasized that the economy was growing well under Biden, countering the narrative that Trump faced a dire situation. Similarly, Gary Cohn, former director of the White House National Economic Council during Trump’s first term, described the economy as “very stable” with “real solid economic growth.”

These expert opinions challenge the notion that Trump inherited a “bad economy,” reinforcing the idea that the economic landscape was more favorable than some political narratives suggest.

Conclusion: A Complex Economic Landscape

The debate over the state of the economy during the transition from Biden to Trump is emblematic of the broader political discourse in the United States. While Senator Scott’s claims paint a bleak picture, data and expert analysis reveal a more nuanced reality. The economy, while not without its challenges, was experiencing growth and recovery, contradicting the narrative of a “crappy” economy.

As the political landscape continues to evolve, it is essential for voters to critically evaluate economic claims and seek out factual information. Understanding the complexities of the economy can empower citizens to make informed decisions as they navigate the political arena.